Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Symbolic Similarities in The Shunammite and The...

Helthall 1 Travis Helthall Professor Rich Carpenter ENGL102-09 English Composition II May 8, 2012 Symbolic Similarities Research Paper The definition of metamorphosis as told by the Merriam-Webster dictionary is as follows â€Å"a marked and more or less abrupt developmental change in the form or structure of an animal (as a butterfly or a frog) occurring subsequent to birth or hatching.† (1) Whereas the Shunammite is just a woman hailing from Shumen, although the name is more so known for the biblical story of the Shunammite in the Book of Kings. That story was about a Shunammite whom was made to lay with the old and dying king David; she was a weak and vulnerable woman when it came to the idea of her being able to have children. So in the†¦show more content†¦Unlike Gregor, because of the picture his mother faints, which creates the illusion of violence to the father, which in turn makes him throw the apples at Gregor, and in the end leads to his death. Michael Ryan also stated very nicely in his essay that Gregor was punished for no apparent reason, or at least no reason the reade r can come up with, so in this aspect the metamorphosis of Gregor symbolizes arbitrary punishment or in other words he is punished just because the author had the power to do so. (220) Like Gregor, Luisa was punished for no reason, she was being a good â€Å"daughter† to Polo and he takes advantage of her because of his lust she did nothing to deserve it, but due to the power of the author it happened and even though she didn’t die like Gregor it did cause her a lot of mental pain and social pain. In both â€Å"The Shunammite† and â€Å"The Metamorphosis† symbols of negative change and strife appear to oppose each of the protagonists. In both stories they end up changing the people around Gregor and Luisa, Gregor’s negative symbol would be his sister, or rather his family as a whole. Grete who is Gregor’s sister states that the family needed to get rid of him and that if that really was Gregor he would have realized that there is no way f or the family to live with such a creature. To this Hill states that â€Å"The point is, however, that the creature is Gregor,

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Elements of Academic Style Humanities

Question: Discuss about the Elements of Academic Style for Humanities. Answer: Introduction: When it comes to academic writing, there are different learning styles that a person can adopt depending on their own understanding and tutor requirements. However, when a student incorporates different styles, it increases their ability to meet the requirements of the task(Gump, 2014). Different learning styles approaches apply in different academic work as follows: Visual- In this type of learning, the student will mostly use images and picture to illustrate or explain a particular point in the texts(Turabian, Booth, Colomb, Williams, 2007). Verbal This is also one of the most common academic writing learning styles. Here the student will make use of words mostly when working on an assignment or meeting the requirements of the academic assessment(Turabian, Booth, Colomb, Williams, 2007). Physical this is the use of body, the hands and other sense of the learner. For example, the filling of questionnaire, expressing thoughts and conducting analysis in a computer. Logical- This is the most common, here the student will prefer using reason or logic and other systems while conducting academic assignments. Logical style enables the learner to express their argument based on the previous findings(Turabian, Booth, Colomb, Williams, 2007). Social This is where people gather in groups to do assignments. Here each member of the group receive their own questions where they will fill and combine both as a group assignment(Turabian, Booth, Colomb, Williams, 2007). Solitary this is where the learner prefers working alone and conducting self-study(Turabian, Booth, Colomb, Williams, 2007). References Gump, S. (2014). The Elements of Academic Style: Writing for the HumanitiesEric Hayot.The Elements of Academic Style: Writing for the Humanities. New York: Columbia University Press. Turabian, K., Booth, W., Colomb, G., Williams, J. (2007). A manual for writers of research papers, theses, and dissertations: Chicago style for students and researchers (7 ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Lord Of The Flies The Evil free essay sample

Lord Of The Flies- The Evil A ; Primitivism In Man Essay, Research Paper The Evil A ; Primitivism in Man In the narrative Lord of the Flies Ralph, the democratic character, and Jack, the dictator are the most of import chief characters. Ralph is the voice of hope on the island, and without that, the male childs would hold turned to savagery much faster, and under the control of Jack. William Golding uses Ralph and his character foil, Jack, to demo how civilisation works and how it doesn # 8217 ; t. Jack, the head of the huntsmans, represents the concealed human passion and about carnal inhuman treatment, and Ralph, who represents human common sense to demo how civlization is. This narrative is an fable. This means the character, events and puting represent deeper truths or generalisations so those suggested by the surface narrative. There are four chief characters, and each character represents different types of people in the universe. We will write a custom essay sample on Lord Of The Flies The Evil or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Jack is the dictator who uses force to demo his ideas and feelings. Therefore he is the destructive side of adult male. He is the type of individual who would instead hold merriment and satisfaction over work. On the other manus Ralph is the truster in democracy and equity. He is the voice of hope, and the responsible type of individual. The male childs on the island, allegorically demo what the human civilisation is like. Ralph stands for order and behavior of society. Each chapter begins with order, which means that Ralph has control. Ralph uses the conch to demo order and the right to talk. By the terminal of each chapter there is no order and there is normally chaos, this shows that evil and/or fright has control, intending Jack has control. Allegorically in the universe it would be a legislative authorities versus a military type of authorities. Where Ralph is the legislative and Jack is military. The upset caused by Jack, threatens the island and the society that Ralph has tried so difficult to organize. Ralph wants to hold a fire, so they can be rescued, but Jack is more disquieted about holding merriment so being rescued and this is a major struggle. The fire is a symbol for hope and enlightenment, but when it gets out of control it becomes really destructive. Anything without order and control can go destructive, this is why Ralph is so of import to the society. The two character foils, Ralph and Jack, have different thoughts and want different things. Ralph wants huts and a signal fire. The huts which stand for civilisation and the signal fire is needed to acquire rescued. This shows that Ralph creates and physiques. On the opposite terminal of that is Jack. Jack wants to run and kill hogs and have fun. This shows crudeness. Jack is shown as a individual who kills and destroys. Here is the struggle ; making and constructing versus violent death and destroying. Ralph asks Jack what he wants: # 8221 ; Don # 8217 ; t you want to be rescued? All you talk about is pig, hog, hog! # 8221 ; And Jack answers him and tells him what he wants: # 8220 ; But we want meat! # 8221 ; This tells us that Ralph and Jack will non settle their differences. Right from the start integrity of society is threatened by the different intents of the male childs. Ralph was neer comfy with crudeness, but Jack instead enjoyed it. Ralph thinks to himself: # 8220 ; He would wish to hold a bath, a proper wallow with soap # 8230 ; and decided that a toothbrush would come in ready to hand too. # 8221 ; Ralph resists crudeness strongly but is still sucked into it. Even though he resists crudeness, he still went on a hog Hunt and when he gets a pang at the hog, he becomes really proud of himself, and ends up basking the Hunt really much. This shows that every homo has an evil side. Even Ralph, who is the 1 who perfectly hates crudeness. The dead pilot in the tree suggests that worlds have de-evolved, gone backwards in development. Ralph calls: â€Å"If merely they could direct a message to us†¦ a mark or something.† The dead pilot was the mark that the existent universe isn’t making any better so they were making on the island. Jack objects to making things that Ralph tells the whole group of the male childs to make, every bit good he objects to Ralph # 8217 ; s being main. Ralph still believes in the conch, and thinks it still holds some order: # 8220 ; Jack! Jack! You haven # 8217 ; t got the conch! Let me speak. # 8221 ; Again Ralph refers to the regulations: # 8220 ; # 8216 ; The regulations! # 8217 ; shouted Ralph, # 8216 ; you # 8217 ; re interrupting the regulations! # 8217 ; # 8221 ; Jack replies with: # 8220 ; Who cares? # 8221 ; His answer is short and knifing. Once Jack says this, the reader knows that there is no turning back. The conversation continues: # 8220 ; Because the regulations are the lone thing we # 8217 ; ve got! # 8221 ; And to stop the statement about regulations, Jack says: # 8221 ; Bollocks to the regulations! # 8230 ; # 8221 ; Jack so protests to utilizing the conch: # 8220 ; # 8216 ; Conch! Conch! # 8217 ; shouted Jack, # 8216 ; we don # 8217 ; t need th e conch anymore. # 8217 ; # 8221 ; Ralph subsequently thinks to himself: # 8221 ; The universe, that apprehensible and lawful universe, was stealing off # 8230 ; # 8221 ; The struggle between the two of them, which was besides caused by different positions on the being of a animal, culminate when Jack decides to divide from Ralph. When the groups separate, neither of them net income from it, merely Ralph and Piggy recognize this. Ralph # 8217 ; s group is non large plenty to maintain the signal fire traveling, and Jack and the huntsmans do non hold Piggy # 8217 ; s spectacless to do their ain fire, to roast their hogs. Since most of the male childs have lost the demand for civilisation and the hope of being rescued, Ralph has lost control of them. They now fear the animal, and Jack tells the male childs that if they are huntsmans they can protect themselves from the animal. So now Jack gets control of most of the male childs. Ralph loses hope: # 8220 ; I # 8217 ; m frightened. Of us. I want to travel place. O god I want to travel home. # 8221 ; But Piggy was at that place to assist him out of his slack for a spot. But when Piggy is killed, Ralph is incapacitated and despairing. He is entirely and it seems that Ralph # 8217 ; s common sense has wholly been defeated. There is a running subject in William Golding # 8217 ; s Lord of the Flies. Man is savage at bosom, this is shown by Ralph in the hog Hunt, and ever finally returning back to an immorality and crude nature. This is all shown by Jack and his group of huntsmans when they have the hog dances, the hogs head as a scarifices and, last but non least, they turn into a group of barbarians. Ralph and his common sense stays about the same throughout the book, it # 8217 ; s Jack and his huntsmans who change. To stop, here # 8217 ; s a quotation mark from David Anderson # 8217 ; s work entitled Nostaldia for the Primates: In this book Golding succeeds in giving converting signifier to which exists deep in our self-awareness. By the accomplishment of his authorship, he takes the reader measure by measure along the same regressive path as that traversed by the male childs on the island # 8230 ; Our first reaction are those of # 8216 ; civilized # 8217 ; people. But as the narrative continues, we find ourselves being caught up in the bang of the Hunt and the exhilarat- ion of slaughter and blood and the whole elemental feeling of the island and the sea # 8230 ; The backup of Golding # 8217 ; s thesis comes non from the fanciful events on the island but from the world of the readers response to them. Our heads turn to the indignations of our century the slaughter of the first war, the concentration cantonments and atom- bombs of the 2nd # 8211 ; and we realize that Golding has compelled us to admit that there is in each of us a hidden deferral which horrifyingly declares our complicity in anguish and slaying # 8230 ;

Saturday, March 14, 2020

Abortion Issues - How They Affect American Politics

Abortion Issues - How They Affect American Politics Abortion issues surface in almost every American election, whether its a local race for school board, a statewide race for governor or a federal contest for Congress or the White House. Abortion issues have polarized American society since the U.S. Supreme Court legalized the procedure. On one side are those who believe women are not entitled to end the life of an unborn child. On the other are those who believe women have the right to decide what happens to their body. Often there is no room for debate between the side. Related Story: Is Abortion the Right Thing to Do? In general, most Democrats support a womans right to have an abortion and most Republicans oppose it. There are notable exceptions, though, including some politicians who have waffled on the issue. Some Democrats who are conservative when it comes to social issues such oppose abortion rights, and some moderate Republicans are open to allowing women to have the procedure. A 2016 Pew Research Survey  found that 59 percent of Republicans believe abortion should be illegal, and 70 percent of Democrats believe the procure should be allowed. Overall, though, a narrow majority of Americans - 56 percent in the Pew poll  -   support legalized abortion and 41 percent oppose it.  In both cases, these figures have remained relatively stable for at least two decades, the Pew Researchers found. When Abortion Is Legal In the United States Abortion refers to the voluntary termination of a pregnancy, resulting in the death of the fetus or embryo. Abortions performed prior to the third trimester are legal in the United States.Abortion-rights advocates believe a woman should have access to whatever health care she needs and that she should have control over her own body. Opponents of abortion rights believe an embryo or fetus is alive and thus abortion is tantamount to murder.   Current Status The most controversial of abortion issues is the so-called partial birth abortion, a rare procedure. Beginning in the mid-90s, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate introduced legislation to ban partial birth abortions. In late 2003, Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.This law was drafted after the Supreme Court ruled Nebraskas partial birth abortion law unconstitutional because it did not allow a doctor to use the procedure even if it were the best method to preserve the health of the mother. Congress attempted to circumvent this ruling by declaring that the procedure is never medically necessary. History Abortion has existed in almost every society and was legal under Roman law, which also condoned infanticide. Today, almost two-thirds of the women in the world may obtain a legal abortion.When America was founded, abortion was legal. Laws prohibiting abortion were introduced in the mid-1800s, and, by 1900, most had been outlawed. Outlawing abortion did nothing to prevent pregnancy, and some estimates put the number of annual illegal abortions from 200,000 to 1.2 million in the 1950s and 1960s.States began liberalizing abortion laws in the 1960s, reflecting changed societal mores and, perhaps, the number of illegal abortions.  In 1965, the Supreme Court introduced the idea of a right to privacy in Griswold v. Connecticut as it struck down laws that banned the sale of condoms to married people.Abortion was legalized in 1973 when the U.S.Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade that during the first trimester, a woman has the right to decide what happens to her body. This landmark decision rested on the right to privacy which was introduced in 1965. In addition, the Court ruled that the state could intervene in the second trimester and could ban abortions in the third trimester. However, a central issue, which the Court declined to address, is whether human life begins at conception, at birth, or at some point in between.In 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court overturned Roes trimester approach and introduced the concept of viability. Today, approximately 90% of all abortions occur in the first 12 weeks.In the 1980s and 1990s, anti-abortion activism spurred on by opposition from Roman Catholics and conservative Christian groups turned from legal challenges to the streets. The organization Operation Rescue organized blockades and protests around abortion clinics. Many of these techniques were prohibited by the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. Pros Most polls suggest that Americans, by a slim majority, call themselves pro-choice rather than pro-life. That does not mean, however, that everyone who is pro-choice believes that abortion is acceptable under any circumstance. A majority support at least minor restrictions, which the Court found reasonable as well under Roe.Thus the pro-choice faction contains a range of beliefs from no restrictions (the classic position) to restrictions for minors (parental consent) ... from support when a womans life is endangered or when the pregnancy is the result of rape to opposition just because a woman is poor or unmarried.Principle organizations include the Center for Reproductive Rights, The National Organization for Women (NOW), National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, and the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. Cons The pro-life movement is thought of as more black-and-white in its range of opinions than the pro-choice faction. Those who support life are more concerned with the embryo or fetus and believe that abortion is murder. Gallup polls starting in 1975 consistently show that only a minority of Americans (12-19 percent) believe that all abortions should be banned.Nevertheless, pro-life groups have taken a strategic approach to their mission, lobbying for mandated waiting periods, prohibitions on public funding and denial of public facilities.In addition, some sociologists suggest that abortion has become a symbol of the changing status of women in society and of changing sexual mores. In this context, pro-life supporters may reflect a backlash against the womens movement.Principle organizations include the Catholic Church, Concerned Women for America, Focus on the Family, and National Right to Life Committee. Where It Stands President George W. Bush supported and signed the constitutionally questionable partial-birth abortion ban and, as Governor of Texas, vowed to put an end to abortion. Immediately after taking office, Bush eliminated U.S. funding to any international family planning organization that provided abortion counseling or services even if they did so with private funds.There was no easily-accessed issue statement about abortion on the 2004 candidate web site. However, in an editorial entitled The War Against Women the New York Times wrote: The lengthening string of anti-choice executive orders, regulations, legal briefs, legislative maneuvers, and key appointments emanating from his administration suggests that undermining the reproductive freedom essential to womens health, privacy and equality is a major preoccupation of his administration - second only, perhaps, to the war on terrorism.

Thursday, February 27, 2020

The problem of unaccompanied illegal immigrant children Essay - 184

The problem of unaccompanied illegal immigrant children - Essay Example Conversation surrounding this unaccompanied immigrant child has been polarized politically, as the opposition appears intent on laying the blame at the president and government’s claiming that they are not doing enough to secure the nation from intrusion (The Editorial Board). While the government may or may not agree with this sentiments their primary concern at the moment is how to address the situation at hand and try to solve the problem without endangering the lives of the vulnerable minors. One of the issues that have been subject to incessant opposition from the republican side is the fact that many of these children have to be tried and provided with lawyers which comes at a cost to the government. However, others argue that the cost of keeping the minors in detention is far greater than that of providing them with legal representation. Attempts by the state to have unaccompanied and unregistered minors to access and education have been frequently opposed by the opposi tion, but on the large those released in the custody of the relatives in the US can access it. Both sides are justified in their different positions on the matter, despite the opponents appearing uncaring its worth noting that these children will likely lead a life of poverty and as young adults will be likely to engage in criminal activities in the US. Besides, there is no way of knowing why there really come to the US and some of them may well be juvenile delinquents (You Hot News). Nevertheless, the government has a responsibility for all those who enter its boarders; thus, children deserving of refugee or asylum should be granted the same without irrespective of the circumstances under which the entered the US. Ultimately, it is inevitable that there are serious challenges underpinning the immigration issue, but they are best solved by collective action objectively addressing the concerns of both sides.  

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Child Labor in Egypt Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Child Labor in Egypt - Essay Example Failure of observing ethical stipulations may lead to the incidences of taboos, a common element in the incidents of ethical based violations. However, the task of establishing personal ethics is rather demanding. This is with regards to the essence of ethics in an individual’s life. Adoption of appropriate ethical perceptions is a demand that is laid to the person by his or her immediate community. This makes ethics seem inclusive of an expectation, as well as the desire to protect ones perception of life. Ethical beliefs are regularly challenged, especially during the address of various aggressions in the daily lour daily lives (DiMauro, 2006). Our success in the address of these challenges implies a positive or an impressive performance of our ethical beliefs. The development of successful ethical trends is based on various attributes of our daily lives (Bernardin, 2008). Amongst the factors that contributed in the improvement of my ethical perception includes the influence attributed to my family. A family is central in the up bring of any child. It forms an integral part of our lives. My family contributed grossly towards my adaptation of various perceptions of life. This was achieved via both discipline and emulation. While growing up, I emulated the senior members of my family with regards to addressing the challenges that I encountered in my daily undertaking. I learnt to reason along their perception, and solve a situation via the sourced lessons. My parents played a central role n moderating my ethical perceptions. They established the expected pathway along which I was anticipated to establish them. In addition, they imposed strict regulations on behaviours that prompted the violation of these measures. This eventuated into my possession of a set of ethical beliefs along which I developed the rest of my ethical perception. The rest of the contributors of my personal belief includes the guidance from

Friday, January 31, 2020

Atticus Finch - To Kill a Mockingbird Essay Example for Free

Atticus Finch To Kill a Mockingbird Essay Throughout chapters 1-17 in To Kill A Mockingbird, Atticus Finch is shown as a very courageous and non-judgemental person. At times in the book he is also a very caring father but he can be strict at times. His name, Atticus is also a very polite man and always shows courtesy to the people he meets. Many people that live in Maycomb know Atticus is a gentleman and is very polite. He also has a conscience when he says that if he didn’t defend a Negro then he would be ashamed and wouldn’t be able to hold his head up in town. Harper Lee portrayed Atticus as a very courageous man. Atticus is courageous because he takes up a case no one else dares to take, the Tom Robinson case. He was willing to risk his honour and dignity to help the poorly accused black man. Although he gets a lot of abuse from various people, for example Mrs Dubose when she says, â€Å"Atticus is a nigger-lover†, he still doesn’t step down from the case and ignores people. He even put his Children in the way when Scout nearly gets in to a fight against Cecil Jacobs when Cecil Jacobs says that â€Å"Scout Finch’s daddy defends niggers†. Scout even takes abuse from her own family when her cousin, Francis, says that Atticus is a â€Å"nigger-lover† which really puts Scout on edge and she starts a fight with Francis. Atticus is also a very non-judgemental person and will always look at things from both sides of the story. In chapter 3 Atticus says, â€Å"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view until you climb into his skin and walk around in it†. Here, Atticus is saying that you can’t judge something until you see things from their point of view, until you see what they’re experiencing. Atticus is a very caring father but a strict one too. He is very caring when Scout comes home from her first day in school and complains that Miss Caroline (the teacher) doesn’t want Atticus and Scout reading together any more. Atticus decides to make a deal with Scout, â€Å"If you’ll concede the necessity of going to school, we’ll go on reading every night just as we always have†. This shows that he cares about Scout concerns and decides to make a deal to make her happy. Although caring he is also a strict father and when Jem loses her cool and destroys Mrs Dubose’s flowers he makes Jem go back and apologies. To do something like this to a sick lady is inexcusable. I strongly advise you to go down and have a talk with Mrs Dubose†. As well as a good father he is also a very polite and well-mannered man. For example, in the court trial with Mayella, Atticus wouldn’t call her Mayella but Miss Mayella but Mayella took it like Atticus was mocking her. Judge Taylor had to calm her down by saying, â€Å"Mr Finch is always courteous to everybody†. This is saying that Atticus is always polite and courteous to everyone he meets. He is also very polite to Mrs Dubose even though Mrs Dubose shout insults to him every time he walks by. Atticus would sweep off his hat, wave gallantly to her and say, ‘Good evening, Mrs Dubose! You look like a picture this evening. ’† This shows that even though Mrs Dubose is horrid to him, he still says hello and is polite to her. Atticus is also very aware of his own reputation and tries to be morally good as much as he can be. He does this by helping Tom Robinson in a case they would probably lose. Scout asks him why he is defending Tom Robinson and Atticus replies, â€Å"The main one is that if I didnt, I couldnt hold my head up in town†. This shows he has morals that he follows so that he can have respect not for others but himself as well. Throughout chapters 1-17 Atticus is shown as a courageous person. As well as being courageous he is non-judgemental especially when he says, â€Å"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view until you climb into his skin and walk around in it†. Atticus is also portrayed as a caring father when Scout is having trouble at school; Atticus is there to support her. Harper Lee has overall made Atticus a very polite, wise and respected man in To Kill A Mockingbird.